The City of Virginia Beach received a $449,000 grant from the Federal Transit Administration
(part of the Department of Transportation) to study transportation alternatives for visitors to reach Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge
(BBNWR) without using private motor vehicles. Transportation alternatives can include providing trams from populated areas of the city to the refuge, construction of a shared-use path for biking and walking, and development of canoe/kayak facilities.
The grant program is called the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Program
, or “TRIPP” for short. Its purpose is to foster alternative transportation to federal lands, including national parks, wildlife refuges, and national forests. TRIPP was eliminated in MAP-21, the current federal funding law for transportation, but these grant funds are still assigned for this project.
Scope of the Study
This grant is for an evaluation of transportation alternatives. The City's application
outlined three specific alternatives:
- Extend the tram service beyond Sandbridge. Trams are operated within the Refuge, using volunteers to give guided tours, but this would expand the service along Sandbridge Road and establish remote parking area(s), perhaps at the planned Refuge visitor center and/or in the Red Mill area.
- Build the Back Bay Refuge Trail. This work includes mapping, wetlands delineation, environmental documents, and preliminary design and cost estimates, but no actual construction.
- Improve water access. Several canoe/kayak launch sites exist around Back Bay. We'll look at how we can improve them or add more in additional locations.
The program also requires that there be a no-build alternative to set a baseline against which the other alternatives can be compared.
A citizen information meeting was held on August 7, 2014 to discuss ideas for enhancing environmentally-friendly visitor access to BBNWR and False Cape State Park. 95 people attended and 58 submitted comment forms. Over 100 more people submitted comments and suggestions via Virtual Town Hall before the September 9 deadline. The study's Technical Advisory Committee is reviewing all of the comments to determine if any of the suggested alternatives meet the criteria to be included in the study:
Alternatives that meet these criteria will be evaluated for practicality and financial feasibility. Alternatives that satisfy those criteria will be added to the study.
- Reduce traffic congestion
- Enhance visitor mobility, accessibility and safety
- Improve visitor education, recreation and health benefits
- Protect sensitive natural, cultural and historical resources
- Reduce pollution
Public Meeting Documents
- February 2012: FTA announced the grant selections
- August 2012: The City contracted with HRT to serve as the administrative pass-thru from FTA.
- February - June 2013: The City advertised a Request for Proposals and selected a consultant.
- March 2014: FTA completed processing the grant paperwork.
- June 2014: The study officially began with some initial background research and field work, such as wetlands delineations and surveying for the three known alternatives.
- August 7 - September 9, 2014: Public comment period to receive suggestions of additional alternatives for study
Dates subject to change
- Phase 1 (June - October 2014): Public engagement process and initial project research.
- Phase 2 (November 2014 - May 2015): Evaluate the alternatives and prepare the draft report.
- Phase 3 (June - November 2015): Review the draft report with the public and FTA, and then finalize the report.
When the grant report is completed, the City, the Refuge, and other interested parties can pursue implementation through a variety of federal grants and other programs.
The first map is an overview of the area. Inset A provides a close-up of Little Island Park launch and the entrance to the Refuge. Inset B provides a close-up of the existing visitor's center in the Refuge.